Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Transplant Proc ; 56(1): 97-104, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38216361

RESUMEN

AIMS AND BACKGROUND: To describe the prevalence of IgA deposits (IgAD) in renal allografts in a cohort of renal transplant recipients and to analyze their management strategies and histopathology. To assess graft function and proteinuria after 1 year of follow-up. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prospective longitudinal follow-up study was carried out in VPS Lakeshore Hospital and Research Centre, Kochi, Kerala, over a period of 5 years (July 2015 to June 2020). Kidney transplant recipients with allograft biopsies that reported IgAD on immunofluorescence were included in the study. Light microscopy and immunofluorescence studies were performed. Mesangial hypercellularity (M); segmental glomerulosclerosis (S); endocapillary hypercellularity (E); tubular atrophy/interstitial fibrosis (T); crescents (C) (MEST-C) Scoring was done in patients with pathogenic IgAD. Treatment strategies included increased baseline steroid dosage, rituximab administration, and plasma exchange. Clinical details and management strategies were analyzed, and patients were followed up for 1 year after diagnosis. Changes in graft function (S. Creatinine) and proteinuria (Urine Protein/Creatinine ratio) were analyzed. Clinico-pathologic correlation with the MEST-C scores was also done. RESULTS: Out of 1036 kidney transplants done in the study period, 760 graft biopsies were performed. Sixty-four cases had post-transplant deposition of IgA (8%). The mean age was 45 ± 11.25SD years. The study had 51 men and 13 women. Induction immunosuppression comprised rabbit antithymocyte globulin in 29 (45%) patients and basiliximab in 35 (54%). Maintenance immunosuppression in all comprised tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and steroids. There were 2 groups: group A (pathogenic IgAD) and group B (incidental IgAD). Group A had 46 cases (71.9%), out of which 8 had "active" IgA nephropathy (endocapillary proliferation, crescents, and IgA vasculitis), and 38 had "inactive" IgAD. In patients with active deposits, 3 had cellular crescents (18%, 30%, and 23%), all 8 had endocapillary proliferation, and 2 had vasculitis. Group B had 18 cases (28.1%), comprising T cell-mediated rejections (5), antibody-mediated rejection (8), BK virus nephropathy (1), and interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy (4). In group A, 22 (47.8%) presented with graft dysfunction, 8 (17.3%) with isolated proteinuria, and 14 (30.4%) patients presented with a combination. Two (4.3%) patients had neither. Fourteen (30.4%) patients presented within 1 month of renal transplant. In patients of group A, at the end of 1 year of treatment, the mean S. Creatinine reduced to 1.68 mg/dL from 1.84 mg/dL, and the mean protein/creatinine ratio reduced from 1.2 to 0.5 (±1.17). In patients with "active IgA" lesions, at the end of 1 year of treatment, the mean S. Creatinine increased slightly to 1.68 mg/dL (±0.47SD) from 1.48 mg/dL (±0.52SD), and the mean protein/creatinine ratio reduced from 2.32 (±1.56SD) to 1.05 (±1.70SD). In the 16 patients with IgAD and proteinuria, at the end of 1 year of treatment, the mean S. Creatinine decreased to 1.41 ± 0.32 SD mg/dL from 1.47±0.37SD mg/dL and the mean protein/creatinine ratio reduced from 1.12 ± 1.31 SD to 0.39±0.75 SD. In the remaining 22 patients with acute tubular injury, at the end of 1 year, the mean S. Creatinine decreased to 1.920.32 SD mg/dL from 2.10.8SD mg/dL, and the mean protein/creatinine ratio reduced from 1.1 ± 1.31 SD to 0.66 ± 1.45 SD. In the MEST-C scoring analysis, all scores were 0 in 20 (43.4%) biopsies, only M1 score in 11 (23.9%) biopsies, only E1 score in 10 biopsies (21.7%), S1 in 13 (28.2%) cases. CONCLUSION: Immunoglobulin A deposits occur commonly after transplant; these may represent recurrence, de novo IgA, or donor-derived IgAD. Although commonly benign, some may cause significant graft dysfunction and graft loss. IgAD can present as varying combinations of graft dysfunction and proteinuria. Active IgA pathologies may occur early in the post-transplant course, may have significant graft dysfunction, and need proactive management. There is a correlation between segmental sclerosis and proteinuria. Evidence for the efficacy of Rituximab, plasma exchange, and prolonged courses of steroids is wanting; however, some benefits are possible. Long-term follow-up is essential.


Asunto(s)
Glomerulonefritis por IGA , Trasplante de Riñón , Masculino , Humanos , Femenino , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Trasplante de Riñón/efectos adversos , Rituximab/uso terapéutico , Estudios Prospectivos , Creatinina , Estudios de Seguimiento , Riñón/patología , Glomerulonefritis por IGA/patología , Proteinuria/etiología , Inmunoglobulina A , Esteroides/uso terapéutico , Fibrosis , Aloinjertos/patología , Atrofia/patología , Biopsia/efectos adversos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...